Therefore, it may only be something that can happen on certain levels of GPU performance. With the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER this did not happen. It’s the best theory we have at the moment. Our running theory is that at “Prefer Maximum Performance” it is keeping the voltage and other factors so high that it is actually hitting the power limit wall or TDP wall, and thus causing GPU Boost to throttle back the clock speed a bit. This caused a little loss in performance. However, when we switched to “Prefer Maximum Performance” the clock speed dropped half-way through the game down to 1905MHz. It seems that on the GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER “Optimal Power” and “Adaptive” power have the exact same result. We tested the GPU Clock frequency on both video cards in all three power modes. The RTX 2060 SUPER did fluctuate a few degrees total, but it wasn’t a major difference. There also weren’t any major differences in GPU Temperature. It seems there are no big differences no matter the power mode when playing games at full tilt. This was also confirmed with the GPUz Power Consumption board power number. None of the power modes saved power or made the GPU consume more power while gaming. The power savings of both Optimal and Adaptive are worth it.Īt full-load though, playing a game we noticed no differences in the peak total system Wattage. Turning on “Prefer Maximum Performance” will make your Idle Wattage skyrocket. Quite simply, “Optimal Power” and “Adaptive” provide the best Idle Wattage power. In our testing, we found that the power modes do directly affect total system Idle Wattage. Power and Wattage are very important, you want the maximum performance, but you also want the most efficient way to get there. In addition, we looked at Power and Wattage, GPU Temperature and GPU Frequency to see if there are any hidden differences beyond gaming. We compared gaming performance in each power mode. In this review today we tackled that question head-on with real-world practical testing. Under the Power Management Mode, you are presented with the default option “Optimal Power” but you also have “Adaptive” and “Prefer Maximum Performance.”Ī common question that comes up is if you should change that setting to get better gaming performance. ![]() We got this situation every time since Wii.NVIDIA offers three power mode settings under its driver control panel. Of course i hope it will be more powerful but it's Nintendo. So even with Tegra X2 with reasonable clocks we can easily get a 2x Switch (2x RAM, 2x memory bandwidth, 2x cpu/gpu clocks, faster SSD, etc, etc.) plus ensure backwards compatibility. Super-reasonable battery life (and even more in a revision at lower node (8nm for example) ~ 2x the memory bandwidth (probably also 8GB of RAM) OG Switch was very underclocked at 16nm and at ~half of the performance of 12nm Tegra X1+ (768mhz vs 1267mhz) and the main bottleneck is memory bandwidth so with Tegra X2 we can get: Ease of development (about the same platform, just more powerful) Basically 2x everything performance and memory relatedģ. Sorry for rushed post but my bet that it will be based on Tegra X2 on 12nm or "lower" node because:ģ. I can't see Nintendo do this powerful console.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |